<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Respect is Better than Tolerance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/2009/01/07/respect-is-better-than-tolerance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/2009/01/07/respect-is-better-than-tolerance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/2009/01/07/respect-is-better-than-tolerance/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/blog/?p=64#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Nice summation Paul.  There are a large number of people whose actions and even beliefs I disagree with strongly.  However they are still human beings with the exact same construction as myself.  Ultimately there is no Us and Them, we all &quot;deserve&quot; basic love and respect without any question of earning it at all.

This is what goes to the essence of what, I think, Melanie is saying.  Beyond &quot;tolerance&quot;, beyond even &quot;respect&quot;, there is the basic assumption that we are all a family and that we must accept each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice summation Paul.  There are a large number of people whose actions and even beliefs I disagree with strongly.  However they are still human beings with the exact same construction as myself.  Ultimately there is no Us and Them, we all &#8220;deserve&#8221; basic love and respect without any question of earning it at all.</p>
<p>This is what goes to the essence of what, I think, Melanie is saying.  Beyond &#8220;tolerance&#8221;, beyond even &#8220;respect&#8221;, there is the basic assumption that we are all a family and that we must accept each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Meshanko</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/2009/01/07/respect-is-better-than-tolerance/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Meshanko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/blog/?p=64#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Great discussion. The interesting aspect about morality is that the more conviction that a person has for their particular beliefs, the more &quot;right&quot; they tend to think they are...which then leads them to the conclusion that other people are &quot;wrong&quot;. Differences based upon religious convictions are particularly challenging because they are based on faith and ultimately neither provable nor disprovable.

To Dorothy&#039;s point, we can always dislike and even disapprove of the behaviors and actions that others engage in, especially those we think are hamrful to themselves (drugs) and others (gossip). And to Melanie&#039;s point, we can still extend respect to the individual(s) involved. Based upon her thought that respect can be demonstrated through a willingness to dialogue, it may even lead to a frank discussion of the differences and possibly even changed beliefs and behaviors on the other side. But once the stark alternatives of &quot;right&quot; and &quot;wrong&quot; rear their heads, dialogue becomes infinitely more difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great discussion. The interesting aspect about morality is that the more conviction that a person has for their particular beliefs, the more &#8220;right&#8221; they tend to think they are&#8230;which then leads them to the conclusion that other people are &#8220;wrong&#8221;. Differences based upon religious convictions are particularly challenging because they are based on faith and ultimately neither provable nor disprovable.</p>
<p>To Dorothy&#8217;s point, we can always dislike and even disapprove of the behaviors and actions that others engage in, especially those we think are hamrful to themselves (drugs) and others (gossip). And to Melanie&#8217;s point, we can still extend respect to the individual(s) involved. Based upon her thought that respect can be demonstrated through a willingness to dialogue, it may even lead to a frank discussion of the differences and possibly even changed beliefs and behaviors on the other side. But once the stark alternatives of &#8220;right&#8221; and &#8220;wrong&#8221; rear their heads, dialogue becomes infinitely more difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Sklarz</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/2009/01/07/respect-is-better-than-tolerance/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Sklarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/blog/?p=64#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Dorothy.  I do see your point regarding not being able to respect others whose moral views conflict with yours. At the same time, I disagree that they do not deserve your respect. Yes, it may be a simplistic approach, but what I am advocating is to at least acknowledge that although you may not agree with them, you can respect that they have a perspective different from yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Dorothy.  I do see your point regarding not being able to respect others whose moral views conflict with yours. At the same time, I disagree that they do not deserve your respect. Yes, it may be a simplistic approach, but what I am advocating is to at least acknowledge that although you may not agree with them, you can respect that they have a perspective different from yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy Greenberger</title>
		<link>http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/2009/01/07/respect-is-better-than-tolerance/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Greenberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.respectfulworkplace.com/blog/?p=64#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Melanie, I think you are correct--respect and tolerance are definately not the same thing, and you defined them well.  But, I feel your application of respect in the workplace is a little too simplistic.  Based on obvious differences of gender, religion, and ethnicity, all of us should listen to others and not judge them purely on these differences.  But morality is a difference that shouldn&#039;t be overlooked, and tolerance is the best we can ask for.  I can&#039;t respect someone who gossips as a means of hurting others, or a someone who abuses alcohol or drugs, or someone who cheats/lies for their own gain, etc.  These individuals don&#039;t view these moral differences, differences in basic beleifs, as being wrong.  I do.  True respect has to be earned, tolerance can be given freely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie, I think you are correct&#8211;respect and tolerance are definately not the same thing, and you defined them well.  But, I feel your application of respect in the workplace is a little too simplistic.  Based on obvious differences of gender, religion, and ethnicity, all of us should listen to others and not judge them purely on these differences.  But morality is a difference that shouldn&#8217;t be overlooked, and tolerance is the best we can ask for.  I can&#8217;t respect someone who gossips as a means of hurting others, or a someone who abuses alcohol or drugs, or someone who cheats/lies for their own gain, etc.  These individuals don&#8217;t view these moral differences, differences in basic beleifs, as being wrong.  I do.  True respect has to be earned, tolerance can be given freely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

